-
Question: What’s one of the most interesting or challenging cases you’ve worked on where your scientific expertise played a key role in the diagnosis?
- Keywords:
Asked by MufaroN on 12 Feb 2025.Question: What’s one of the most interesting or challenging cases you’ve worked on where your scientific expertise played a key role in the diagnosis?
- Keywords:
Comments
Edward commented on :
We had a project where we were looking at diesel engines onboard ships. Now, the engines provide the power to drive the boat, but also supply the heat and light for the crew and passenger comforts.
If the engines fail, it can be really dangerous as the boat is no longer in control.
We wanted to non-invasively monitor the engine. That means, we don’t want to take it apart first to monitor it. We were able to use magnets to fit vibration sensors to the outside of the engine and use some powerful maths to process these vibration signals to find key indicators that are different in healthy engines and faulty engines.
We also found that we just needed to know what a healthy engine looks like in order to detect known and unknown faults. This meant we didn’t have to build a dataset with every possible fault, which would be too expensive and time consuming.
This is the power of machine learning.
Kevin B commented on :
I was once responsible for investigating an aircraft crash. We soon established that the cause of the crash (and onboard fire!) was a fuel leak. Our focus was then on finding where the leak occurred, and if a part had failed, we had to warn other aircraft operators. I really had to go back to some basic science to understand about fluid pressures and flow rates, and then do a series of tests and trials to eventually identify where the system had failed. We found out eventually, and I presented my findings to some very senior people in the aircraft industry – who also had to be ‘re-taught’ ab out fluid dynamics. But I was really pleased that the science was good, and we found the fault.